De Ai Ify

PendingStatic analysis audit pending.

Overview

No static analysis result has been recorded yet. Pattern checks will appear here once the artifact has been analyzed.

Findings (0)

Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.

What this means

The selected document's contents will be processed and a new file may be created next to it.

Why it was flagged

The skill directs the agent to read a user-specified document and write a revised file. This is expected for an editing skill, but users should choose paths carefully.

Skill content
"/de-ai-ify <file_path>" ... "Read original file" ... "Create \"-HUMAN.md\" file"
Recommendation

Run it only on documents you intend to process, and review the generated file before using or publishing it.

What this means

It may be harder to confirm exactly which package version or source was reviewed.

Why it was flagged

The registry metadata lists a different slug and the SKILL front matter lists version 2.0.0, while _meta.json lists version 1.0.0. With no code or install spec, this is mainly a provenance/version clarity issue.

Skill content
"slug": "de-ai-ify", "latest": { "version": "1.0.0"
Recommendation

Verify the package source and version before relying on the skill, especially if installing it outside the registry flow.

What this means

Users may process sensitive or important text believing there is stronger offline or accuracy assurance than the artifacts prove.

Why it was flagged

The package is instruction-only and provides no reviewed implementation or test data to substantiate deterministic offline processing or accuracy claims. The wording may overstate privacy or reliability.

Skill content
"No API calls needed - Pure pattern matching, works offline" ... "92% accuracy"
Recommendation

Treat it as a prompt-based editing aid unless you have confirmed your OpenClaw runtime's data handling and the skill author's evidence.

What this means

The rewritten document could accidentally change or add factual claims even when the user expected only a style edit.

Why it was flagged

The skill promises fact preservation but also describes adding specific examples, which can introduce unsupported names, numbers, or claims.

Skill content
"Keeps your facts, structure, and key points" ... "Added 5 specific examples (replaced vague references)"
Recommendation

Manually fact-check any added examples, statistics, company names, or concrete claims before publishing.