Academic Research Hub

PassAudited by ClawScan on May 1, 2026.

Overview

The skill appears purpose-aligned for academic search and paper downloads, with normal caution needed around installing Python dependencies and saving downloaded files.

This looks reasonable for academic research workflows. Before installing, use a Python virtual environment, be aware that dependencies are not exactly pinned, and direct downloads to a safe project folder. Do not rely on Google Scholar support unless the documentation is clarified.

Findings (3)

Artifact-based informational review of SKILL.md, metadata, install specs, static scan signals, and capability signals. ClawScan does not execute the skill or run runtime probes.

What this means

Installing dependencies may pull newer package versions than the author tested.

Why it was flagged

The skill depends on public Python packages with lower-bound version constraints rather than exact pins. This is normal for a Python-based research tool, but users should install in a virtual environment and be aware of dependency provenance.

Skill content
arxiv>=2.0.0
semanticscholar>=0.8.0
biopython>=1.81
requests>=2.31.0
Recommendation

Use a virtual environment, review dependencies if needed, and prefer a locked requirements file for reproducible installs.

What this means

The skill can create directories and save downloaded PDF files where the user specifies.

Why it was flagged

The script downloads PDFs from discovered paper URLs and writes them to a local output directory. This is expected for the stated paper-download feature, but it is still a local file-writing capability.

Skill content
response = requests.get(pdf_url, timeout=30)
...
with open(filepath, "wb") as f:
    f.write(response.content)
Recommendation

Download only from trusted academic sources and use a dedicated output directory such as a project folder.

What this means

Users may expect broader search coverage than the implementation provides.

Why it was flagged

This conflicts with SKILL.md wording that lists Google Scholar as a supported source. The mismatch appears to be a capability/documentation inconsistency rather than malicious behavior.

Skill content
Google Scholar not included (no API)
Recommendation

Treat Google Scholar support as unavailable unless the maintainer clarifies or updates the implementation and documentation.