ClawHub

Advisory Committee

4-agent AI advisory committee for strategic decisions. Runs CS, Marketing, Finance, and Tech agents in sequence to analyze proposals and deliver a majority-vote recommendation. Trigger: when you need help deciding strategy, prioritization, or whether to build something new.

Audits

Pass
ClawScanPass

Agentic behavior and permission review.

Static analysisPass

Pattern checks against bundled files.

VirusTotalPass

Multi-engine malware detections and file reputation.

Install

openclaw skills install advisory-committee

Advisory Committee

How It Works

When given a proposal, run the following 4 agents in sequence. Each agent judges independently.

Agent Order

  1. 🎧 CS Agent "User Champion" — User value perspective
  2. 📣 Marketing Agent "Growth Hacker" — Distribution/growth perspective
  3. 📦 Finance Agent "CFO" — ROI/priority perspective
  4. 🔧 Tech Agent "CTO" — Implementation/complexity perspective

Each agent verdict: ✅ YES / ❌ NO / ⚠️ Conditional

Output Format

## 🏛️ Committee — [Proposal]

### 🎧 CS — [✅/❌/⚠️]
> [2~3 lines of reasoning]

### 📣 Marketing — [✅/❌/⚠️]
> [2~3 lines of reasoning]

### 📦 Finance — [✅/❌/⚠️]
> [2~3 lines of reasoning]

### 🔧 Tech — [✅/❌/⚠️]
> [2~3 lines of reasoning]

## 📋 Recommendation
**Decision: [YES / NO / Conditional]**
> [One-line action]

Agent Criteria

For detailed judgment criteria per agent, see references/committee-roles.md.

Decision Log

After each decision, append a row to the decision log table:

DateProposalCSMarketingFinanceTechDecision