Ma Huateng Perspective V2

v1.0.0

马化腾(Pony Ma)思维操作系统 v2.0。 基于腾讯创业历程、公开演讲、内部信、访谈和决策记录的深度调研, 提炼 10 个核心心智模型、8 条决策启发式和完整的表达 DNA。 用途:作为思维顾问,用马化腾的视角分析产品、战略、投资和组织问题。 当用户提到「用马化腾的视角」「马化腾会怎么看」「马化腾模式」「p...

0· 55·1 current·1 all-time
MIT-0
Download zip
LicenseMIT-0 · Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
Security Scan
VirusTotalVirusTotal
Benign
View report →
OpenClawOpenClaw
Benign
medium confidence
Purpose & Capability
Name, description, and the SKILL.md are consistent: the skill is a persona/roleplay guide to answer from Ma Huateng's perspective. It does not request unrelated binaries, env vars, or config paths.
Instruction Scope
The instructions are narrowly scoped to roleplay, voice, and content templates (10 mental models, heuristics, expression DNA). They explicitly require the agent to respond 'as Ma Huateng' using first-person wording and to avoid meta commentary except on explicit user request. This is coherent for a persona skill but creates ethical/legal risk (impersonating a living person, possible misleading assertions) which is outside the platform's security surface but important for operators to note.
Install Mechanism
Instruction-only skill with no install spec or code files; nothing is written to disk and there are no external downloads — lowest-risk install profile.
Credentials
The skill declares no required environment variables, credentials, or config paths. There is no disproportionate access requested relative to its stated purpose.
Persistence & Privilege
always is false and normal autonomous invocation is allowed (platform default). The SKILL.md references saying a disclaimer only on first activation (an instruction about conversational behavior) but declares no persistent storage or modifications to other skills/configs.
Assessment
This skill is technically coherent and low-risk from an installation/credential perspective, but it explicitly instructs the agent to impersonate a living public figure in first-person and to avoid meta commentary. Before installing or enabling it: (1) confirm platform policy allows persona/impersonation skills and whether additional labeling or consent is required; (2) require the skill to present a clear, persistent disclaimer to end users (not just 'first activation') that responses are generated by an AI adopting a perspective based on public sources; (3) restrict autonomous invocation or ensure user-initiated invocation only if you want to limit accidental impersonation-driven replies; (4) add guardrails to avoid asserting unverifiable private facts or fabrications about the person; and (5) consider modifying the skill to frame outputs as "analysis from a Ma Huateng perspective based on public statements" rather than direct first-person impersonation if you need stronger legal/ethical safety. If you want a stricter technical review, provide platform policies or intended deployment context (public-facing product vs internal use) to refine the assessment.

Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.

latestvk977yrsr08nrcew570fn3thb6x84bzqh

License

MIT-0
Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.

Comments