blueprint
v1.0.0Requirements blueprint workflow for transforming vague task descriptions into high-quality, implementation-ready Spec + RFC documents. **Trigger conditions (...
⭐ 1· 100·0 current·0 all-time
MIT-0
Download zip
LicenseMIT-0 · Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
Security Scan
OpenClaw
Benign
medium confidencePurpose & Capability
Name/description describe a requirements-to-specs-and-implementation assistant; the SKILL.md contains a matching multi-stage workflow and rules. There are no unrelated required binaries, env vars, or config paths requested — nothing external is asked for that doesn't belong to the declared purpose.
Instruction Scope
Instructions legitimately require elicitation, analysis, reading user-provided artifacts, and (optionally) exploring code and attachments. However, the skill mandates immediate implementation after the user confirms the Spec/RFC and forbids using the assistant 'finish' channel to pause during implementation; this increases autonomy during potentially impactful actions and is worth noting to users.
Install Mechanism
Instruction-only skill with no install spec and no code files to execute. Lowest-risk install posture: nothing is written to disk by an installer.
Credentials
No required environment variables, credentials, or config paths are declared. The skill does not request secrets or unrelated service access.
Persistence & Privilege
always:false and no special privileges requested. Still, the SKILL.md's rule to continue implementing without pausing after confirmation effectively grants extended autonomous action in a session; combine with platform autonomous invocation controls when deciding to use.
Assessment
This skill appears coherent with its stated purpose: it will help you elicit requirements, produce a Spec and RFC, and (if you confirm) proceed to implement them. Key things to consider before installing or using it:
- The skill requires no external credentials or installers, so it won't pull code or ask for secrets during install.
- However, it enforces that once you explicitly confirm the Spec/RFC, the agent must immediately begin implementation and must not pause using the normal assistant finish channel until implementation completes. If you are not ready for the agent to start making changes or running actions autonomously, do NOT confirm—instead ask the agent to only output the Spec/RFC (the skill text admits that as an explicit opt-out).
- The skill is allowed to explore user-provided artifacts (code, attachments, images). If you will supply sensitive files, consider sanitizing them or restricting access before confirming implementation.
- If you want more control, tell the agent up-front to produce only Spec/RFC and to wait for explicit step-by-step approval before any implementation. If the skill later requests credentials, installs, or network access, treat that as a red flag and revoke permission.
What would change this assessment: if the skill declared required environment variables, install steps that download/execute remote code, or included code files that perform network exfiltration or privileged config changes, the verdict would move to suspicious or malicious. At present the main caution is the required automatic implementation behavior — exercise care when confirming work.Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.
latestvk973k9ps4ve8zv09y3y5pzr8mn8346zr
License
MIT-0
Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
