Deep Research Suite

v1.0.0

Deep Research Suite - One command to aggregate, analyze, and synthesize research from multiple sources. Search → Extract → Summarize → Report.

0· 86·0 current·0 all-time

Install

OpenClaw Prompt Flow

Install with OpenClaw

Best for remote or guided setup. Copy the exact prompt, then paste it into OpenClaw for aptratcn/xiaobai-deep-research.

Previewing Install & Setup.
Prompt PreviewInstall & Setup
Install the skill "Deep Research Suite" (aptratcn/xiaobai-deep-research) from ClawHub.
Skill page: https://clawhub.ai/aptratcn/xiaobai-deep-research
Keep the work scoped to this skill only.
After install, inspect the skill metadata and help me finish setup.
Use only the metadata you can verify from ClawHub; do not invent missing requirements.
Ask before making any broader environment changes.

Command Line

CLI Commands

Use the direct CLI path if you want to install manually and keep every step visible.

OpenClaw CLI

Bare skill slug

openclaw skills install xiaobai-deep-research

ClawHub CLI

Package manager switcher

npx clawhub@latest install xiaobai-deep-research
Security Scan
VirusTotalVirusTotal
Benign
View report →
OpenClawOpenClaw
Benign
high confidence
Purpose & Capability
Name/description promise (aggregate, extract, synthesize research) matches the SKILL.md pipeline (multi-source search, extraction, synthesis, and report generation). No unrelated credentials, binaries, or installs are requested.
Instruction Scope
Instructions explicitly tell the agent to fetch content from public sources (web, GitHub, HN, ArXiv, Reddit, news), extract and synthesize it, and save reports to memory/research/. This is within the stated purpose. Minor note: the SKILL.md references writing files to a memory/research/ path even though no config paths are declared — this is common for agent memory but you may want to confirm how the agent's runtime implements and secures that storage.
Install Mechanism
Instruction-only skill with no install spec and no code files. Lowest install risk: nothing is written to disk by an installer or downloaded at install time.
Credentials
No environment variables, credentials, or config paths are requested. The actions described (web crawling and summarization) do not intrinsically require extra secrets. If you expect the skill to access paywalled sources or private repos, those would require credentials and are not currently declared.
Persistence & Privilege
always is false and the skill does not request to modify other skills or system settings. It instructs writing reports to agent memory/storage, which is normal for a research/reporting skill; confirm retention and sharing policies for that storage if you have privacy concerns.
Scan Findings in Context
[no-findings] expected: The regex-based scanner had nothing to analyze because this is an instruction-only skill with no code files. That is expected for a declarative pipeline description.
Assessment
This skill is internally coherent for automated research: it asks the agent to crawl public sources, summarize findings, and save reports. Before enabling it, consider: 1) how your agent runtime handles network access and rate limits (avoid unintended scraping or TOS violations); 2) where memory/research/ is stored and who can read those files (sensitive results could be persisted); 3) whether you want the agent to fetch paywalled or private content — that would require credentials which this skill currently does not request; and 4) verification practices: LLMs can hallucinate citations, so verify key claims and sources in generated reports. If any of these are concerns, review the agent's storage/network policies or limit the skill's autonomous invocation.

Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.

analysisvk97arf6zwrska58zh70tym6c8x858cfcautomationvk97arf6zwrska58zh70tym6c8x858cfclatestvk97arf6zwrska58zh70tym6c8x858cfcresearchvk97arf6zwrska58zh70tym6c8x858cfc
86downloads
0stars
1versions
Updated 6d ago
v1.0.0
MIT-0

Deep Research Suite 🔬

One command to aggregate, analyze, and synthesize research from multiple sources.

What It Does

Input: "Research AI agent memory management trends 2026"

Output:
1. Search 5+ sources
2. Extract key findings
3. Identify patterns
4. Generate structured report
5. Save to file for reference

Research Pipeline

Stage 1: Multi-Source Search

Sources to check:
- Web search (general)
- GitHub (code/examples)
- Hacker News (discussions)
- ArXiv (papers, if relevant)
- Reddit (community opinions)
- News sites (recent articles)

Stage 2: Content Extraction

For each source:
1. Fetch content
2. Extract main points
3. Identify key facts/statistics
4. Note source credibility
5. Tag by topic relevance

Stage 3: Synthesis

Combine findings:
- Group by theme
- Identify consensus views
- Note contradictions
- Highlight emerging trends
- Flag outdated info

Stage 4: Report Generation

Output format:

# Research Report: [Topic]
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD
**Sources**: X sources analyzed

## Executive Summary
[2-3 sentence overview]

## Key Findings

### Trend 1: [Name]
- Source: X, Y, Z
- Evidence: ...
- Implications: ...

### Trend 2: [Name]
...

## Contradictions / Debates
- View A says: ... (Source: X)
- View B says: ... (Source: Y)
- Assessment: ...

## Actionable Insights
1. ...
2. ...

## Sources
- [Source 1](url) - relevance: high
- [Source 2](url) - relevance: medium

Usage Examples

Quick Research

User: "What's new in LLM context window management?"

Agent:
[Searching 5 sources...]
[Extracting key findings...]
[Synthesizing...]

## LLM Context Window Management - 2026 Update

### Key Trends
1. **Dynamic Context Sizing** - Models now auto-adjust context based on task complexity
2. **Semantic Chunking** - Replace fixed-size chunks with meaning-based segments
3. **Context Compression** - 10x compression with minimal info loss

[Full report saved to memory/research/llm-context-2026-04-21.md]

Deep Dive

User: "Deep research on AI agent subagent architecture patterns"

Agent:
[This will take 5-10 minutes for comprehensive analysis]

Stage 1/4: Multi-source search...
- GitHub: 15 repos found
- Papers: 3 relevant
- Discussions: 12 threads

Stage 2/4: Content extraction...
- Analyzing top 10 GitHub repos...
- Extracting paper findings...
- Summarizing discussions...

Stage 3/4: Synthesis...
- Identified 4 architecture patterns
- Found 2 debates
- 3 emerging trends

Stage 4/4: Report generation...

[Report saved to memory/research/subagent-architecture-2026-04-21.md]

Competitive Analysis

User: "Compare popular AI agent memory solutions"

Agent:
[Generating comparison matrix...]

| Solution | Approach | Pros | Cons | Stars |
|----------|----------|------|------|-------|
| Mem0 | Persistent memory | Easy integration | Limited context | 25k |
| Letta | Stateful agents | Full state | Complex setup | 15k |
| LangGraph | Graph memory | Flexible | Learning curve | 100k |

[Full comparison saved to memory/research/memory-solutions-comparison.md]

Output Files

All research saved to memory/research/:

memory/research/
├── llm-context-2026-04-21.md
├── subagent-architecture-2026-04-21.md
└── memory-solutions-comparison.md

Integration with Other Skills

  • Workflow Checkpoint - Research is a multi-step workflow
  • Memory Guard - Save key findings to long-term memory
  • Content Creator - Generate polished reports

Anti-Patterns

❌ Don't rely on single source ❌ Don't skip source credibility check ❌ Don't present outdated info as current ❌ Don't fabricate sources or statistics

License

MIT

Comments

Loading comments...