Vulnerability Scanner
v1.0.0Performs static analysis for OWASP 2025 risks, supply chain threats, secrets detection, code patterns, and prioritizes vulnerabilities by exploitability and...
Security Scan
OpenClaw
Benign
high confidencePurpose & Capability
Name/description (vulnerability scanning, OWASP/supply-chain/secrets) match the included SKILL.md and the provided Python scanner script; no unrelated environment variables, binaries, or external credentials are requested.
Instruction Scope
SKILL.md instructs running the included script against a project path. The script legitimately reads project files (code/config) and runs local checks. It also invokes subprocesses (e.g., 'npm audit' when package.json exists) which may contact package registries — expected for dependency scanning but worth noting since it can reach the network and produce potentially sensitive output (e.g., detected secrets).
Install Mechanism
No install specification — instruction-only skill with a bundled script. Nothing is downloaded or written by an installer step.
Credentials
The skill declares no required env vars or credentials. The scanner searches files for secrets and patterns, which is appropriate for its stated purpose. There are no requests for unrelated service credentials or config paths.
Persistence & Privilege
always:false and user-invocable:true (normal). The skill does not request persistent system-wide privileges or modify other skills' configs.
Assessment
This package appears to be a normal, self-contained source-code vulnerability scanner. Before running it: (1) run it on a copy of the target repository (not on a sensitive production directory), (2) be aware that it will read many files and may report secrets — treat reported results carefully, and do not leak findings to public outputs, (3) npm audit may contact the network/registry if package.json exists, so run in an environment where network activity is acceptable, (4) inspect the included script yourself if you have concerns (it uses subprocess.run and file I/O), and (5) run scans with least privilege or in an isolated container if you want to limit side effects.Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.
latest
Vulnerability Scanner
Advanced vulnerability analysis for OWASP 2025, supply chain security, attack surface mapping, and risk prioritization.
Description
USE WHEN:
- Auditing code for security vulnerabilities
- Reviewing dependencies for supply chain risks
- Scanning for hardcoded secrets or credentials
- Identifying dangerous code patterns (injection, XSS, deserialization)
- Preparing for security audits or penetration tests
- Prioritizing vulnerability remediation by risk
DON'T USE WHEN:
- Need runtime dynamic analysis (use actual pentest tools)
- Scanning compiled binaries (this is source-code focused)
- Need compliance-specific audits (PCI-DSS, HIPAA have dedicated tools)
Scripts
| Script | Purpose | Usage |
|---|---|---|
scripts/security_scan.py | Full security scan | python scripts/security_scan.py <path> [--scan-type all|deps|secrets|patterns|config] |
Quick Start
# Full scan
python scripts/security_scan.py /path/to/project
# Just check for secrets
python scripts/security_scan.py /path/to/project --scan-type secrets
# Summary output
python scripts/security_scan.py /path/to/project --output summary
Reference Files
| File | Purpose |
|---|---|
| checklists.md | OWASP Top 10, Auth, API, Data protection checklists |
1. Security Expert Mindset
Core Principles
| Principle | Application |
|---|---|
| Assume Breach | Design as if attacker already inside |
| Zero Trust | Never trust, always verify |
| Defense in Depth | Multiple layers, no single point |
| Least Privilege | Minimum required access only |
| Fail Secure | On error, deny access |
Threat Modeling Questions
Before scanning, ask:
- What are we protecting? (Assets)
- Who would attack? (Threat actors)
- How would they attack? (Attack vectors)
- What's the impact? (Business risk)
2. OWASP Top 10:2025
Risk Categories
| Rank | Category | Think About |
|---|---|---|
| A01 | Broken Access Control | Who can access what? IDOR, SSRF |
| A02 | Security Misconfiguration | Defaults, headers, exposed services |
| A03 | Software Supply Chain 🆕 | Dependencies, CI/CD, build integrity |
| A04 | Cryptographic Failures | Weak crypto, exposed secrets |
| A05 | Injection | User input → system commands |
| A06 | Insecure Design | Flawed architecture |
| A07 | Authentication Failures | Session, credential management |
| A08 | Integrity Failures | Unsigned updates, tampered data |
| A09 | Logging & Alerting | Blind spots, no monitoring |
| A10 | Exceptional Conditions 🆕 | Error handling, fail-open states |
2025 Key Changes
2021 → 2025 Shifts:
├── SSRF merged into A01 (Access Control)
├── A02 elevated (Cloud/Container configs)
├── A03 NEW: Supply Chain (major focus)
├── A10 NEW: Exceptional Conditions
└── Focus shift: Root causes > Symptoms
3. Supply Chain Security (A03)
Attack Surface
| Vector | Risk | Question to Ask |
|---|---|---|
| Dependencies | Malicious packages | Do we audit new deps? |
| Lock files | Integrity attacks | Are they committed? |
| Build pipeline | CI/CD compromise | Who can modify? |
| Registry | Typosquatting | Verified sources? |
Defense Principles
- Verify package integrity (checksums)
- Pin versions, audit updates
- Use private registries for critical deps
- Sign and verify artifacts
4. Attack Surface Mapping
What to Map
| Category | Elements |
|---|---|
| Entry Points | APIs, forms, file uploads |
| Data Flows | Input → Process → Output |
| Trust Boundaries | Where auth/authz checked |
| Assets | Secrets, PII, business data |
Prioritization Matrix
Risk = Likelihood × Impact
High Impact + High Likelihood → CRITICAL
High Impact + Low Likelihood → HIGH
Low Impact + High Likelihood → MEDIUM
Low Impact + Low Likelihood → LOW
5. Risk Prioritization
CVSS + Context
| Factor | Weight | Question |
|---|---|---|
| CVSS Score | Base severity | How severe is the vuln? |
| EPSS Score | Exploit likelihood | Is it being exploited? |
| Asset Value | Business context | What's at risk? |
| Exposure | Attack surface | Internet-facing? |
Prioritization Decision Tree
Is it actively exploited (EPSS >0.5)?
├── YES → CRITICAL: Immediate action
└── NO → Check CVSS
├── CVSS ≥9.0 → HIGH
├── CVSS 7.0-8.9 → Consider asset value
└── CVSS <7.0 → Schedule for later
6. Exceptional Conditions (A10 - New)
Fail-Open vs Fail-Closed
| Scenario | Fail-Open (BAD) | Fail-Closed (GOOD) |
|---|---|---|
| Auth error | Allow access | Deny access |
| Parsing fails | Accept input | Reject input |
| Timeout | Retry forever | Limit + abort |
What to Check
- Exception handlers that catch-all and ignore
- Missing error handling on security operations
- Race conditions in auth/authz
- Resource exhaustion scenarios
7. Scanning Methodology
Phase-Based Approach
1. RECONNAISSANCE
└── Understand the target
├── Technology stack
├── Entry points
└── Data flows
2. DISCOVERY
└── Identify potential issues
├── Configuration review
├── Dependency analysis
└── Code pattern search
3. ANALYSIS
└── Validate and prioritize
├── False positive elimination
├── Risk scoring
└── Attack chain mapping
4. REPORTING
└── Actionable findings
├── Clear reproduction steps
├── Business impact
└── Remediation guidance
8. Code Pattern Analysis
High-Risk Patterns
| Pattern | Risk | Look For |
|---|---|---|
| String concat in queries | Injection | "SELECT * FROM " + user_input |
| Dynamic code execution | RCE | eval(), exec(), Function() |
| Unsafe deserialization | RCE | pickle.loads(), unserialize() |
| Path manipulation | Traversal | User input in file paths |
| Disabled security | Various | verify=False, --insecure |
Secret Patterns
| Type | Indicators |
|---|---|
| API Keys | api_key, apikey, high entropy |
| Tokens | token, bearer, jwt |
| Credentials | password, secret, key |
| Cloud | AWS_, AZURE_, GCP_ prefixes |
9. Cloud Security Considerations
Shared Responsibility
| Layer | You Own | Provider Owns |
|---|---|---|
| Data | ✅ | ❌ |
| Application | ✅ | ❌ |
| OS/Runtime | Depends | Depends |
| Infrastructure | ❌ | ✅ |
Cloud-Specific Checks
- IAM: Least privilege applied?
- Storage: Public buckets?
- Network: Security groups tightened?
- Secrets: Using secrets manager?
10. Anti-Patterns
| ❌ Don't | ✅ Do |
|---|---|
| Scan without understanding | Map attack surface first |
| Alert on every CVE | Prioritize by exploitability + asset |
| Ignore false positives | Maintain verified baseline |
| Fix symptoms only | Address root causes |
| Scan once before deploy | Continuous scanning |
| Trust third-party deps blindly | Verify integrity, audit code |
11. Reporting Principles
Finding Structure
Each finding should answer:
- What? - Clear vulnerability description
- Where? - Exact location (file, line, endpoint)
- Why? - Root cause explanation
- Impact? - Business consequence
- How to fix? - Specific remediation
Severity Classification
| Severity | Criteria |
|---|---|
| Critical | RCE, auth bypass, mass data exposure |
| High | Data exposure, privilege escalation |
| Medium | Limited scope, requires conditions |
| Low | Informational, best practice |
Remember: Vulnerability scanning finds issues. Expert thinking prioritizes what matters. Always ask: "What would an attacker do with this?"
Comments
Loading comments...
