Go Testing Code Review

Reviews Go test code for proper table-driven tests, assertions, and coverage patterns. Use when reviewing *_test.go files.

MIT-0 · Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
0 · 59 · 0 current installs · 0 all-time installs
byKevin Anderson@anderskev
MIT-0
Security Scan
VirusTotalVirusTotal
Benign
View report →
OpenClawOpenClaw
Benign
high confidence
Purpose & Capability
Name/description (Go test code review) align with the provided materials: a checklist and reference docs for table-driven tests, mocking, structure, benchmarks, fuzzing, etc. Nothing in the package requests unrelated capabilities.
Instruction Scope
SKILL.md contains review guidance and examples for analyzing *_test.go files. It does not instruct reading system files, accessing environment variables, or calling external endpoints beyond typical testing patterns. It expects the agent to review test source code, which is appropriate for this skill.
Install Mechanism
No install spec and no code files — instruction-only skill. Nothing is downloaded or written to disk by an installer, minimizing installation risk.
Credentials
The skill requires no environment variables, binaries, or config paths. No credentials or sensitive tokens are requested; this matches the skill's simple static-review purpose.
Persistence & Privilege
always is false and disable-model-invocation is false (normal). The skill does not request persistent system presence or permissions to modify other skills or system-wide settings.
Scan Findings in Context
[no-findings] expected: The regex-based scanner had no code to analyze (instruction-only skill); therefore no code-level findings were produced. This is expected for a documentation/checklist-only package.
Assessment
This skill is a self-contained checklist and reference for reviewing Go tests and appears coherent and low-risk. Before installing: consider provenance (owner and homepage are unknown), and avoid sending proprietary or secret-containing source code to third-party services; review results are advisory, not authoritative. Because the skill is instruction-only and requests no credentials, there is minimal technical risk, but exercise standard caution about sharing sensitive code or CI credentials when using any code-review automation.

Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.

Current versionv2.3.0
Download zip
latestvk9742zba9v4gsb8aehgqww9v0d83cwke

License

MIT-0
Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.

SKILL.md

Go Testing Code Review

Quick Reference

Issue TypeReference
Test structure, namingreferences/structure.md
Mocking, interfacesreferences/mocking.md

Review Checklist

  • Tests are table-driven with clear case names
  • Subtests use t.Run for parallel execution
  • Test names describe behavior, not implementation
  • Errors include got/want with descriptive message
  • Cleanup registered with t.Cleanup
  • Parallel tests don't share mutable state
  • Mocks use interfaces defined in test file
  • Coverage includes edge cases and error paths
  • Performance-critical functions have Benchmark* tests
  • Input parsers/validators have Fuzz* tests (Go 1.18+)
  • HTTP handlers tested with httptest.NewRequest/httptest.NewRecorder
  • Golden file tests use testdata/*.golden pattern with -update flag

Critical Patterns

Table-Driven Tests

// BAD - repetitive
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
    if Add(1, 2) != 3 {
        t.Error("wrong")
    }
    if Add(0, 0) != 0 {
        t.Error("wrong")
    }
}

// GOOD
func TestAdd(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct {
        name     string
        a, b     int
        want     int
    }{
        {"positive numbers", 1, 2, 3},
        {"zeros", 0, 0, 0},
        {"negative", -1, 1, 0},
    }

    for _, tt := range tests {
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            got := Add(tt.a, tt.b)
            if got != tt.want {
                t.Errorf("Add(%d, %d) = %d, want %d", tt.a, tt.b, got, tt.want)
            }
        })
    }
}

Error Messages

// BAD
if got != want {
    t.Error("wrong result")
}

// GOOD
if got != want {
    t.Errorf("GetUser(%d) = %v, want %v", id, got, want)
}

// For complex types
if diff := cmp.Diff(want, got); diff != "" {
    t.Errorf("GetUser() mismatch (-want +got):\n%s", diff)
}

Parallel Tests

func TestFoo(t *testing.T) {
    tests := []struct{...}

    for _, tt := range tests {
        tt := tt  // capture (not needed Go 1.22+)
        t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
            t.Parallel()
            // test code
        })
    }
}

Cleanup

// BAD - manual cleanup, skipped on failure
func TestWithTempFile(t *testing.T) {
    f, _ := os.CreateTemp("", "test")
    defer os.Remove(f.Name())  // skipped if test panics
}

// GOOD
func TestWithTempFile(t *testing.T) {
    f, _ := os.CreateTemp("", "test")
    t.Cleanup(func() {
        os.Remove(f.Name())
    })
}

Additional Patterns

Benchmarks

func BenchmarkProcess(b *testing.B) {
    data := generateTestData(1000)
    b.ResetTimer()

    for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
        Process(data)
    }
}

// Run: go test -bench=BenchmarkProcess -benchmem

Fuzz Tests (Go 1.18+)

func FuzzParseInput(f *testing.F) {
    // Seed corpus
    f.Add(`{"name": "test"}`)
    f.Add(``)
    f.Add(`{invalid}`)

    f.Fuzz(func(t *testing.T, input string) {
        result, err := ParseInput(input)
        if err != nil {
            return // invalid input is expected
        }
        // If parsing succeeded, re-encoding should work
        if _, err := json.Marshal(result); err != nil {
            t.Errorf("Marshal after Parse: %v", err)
        }
    })
}

// Run: go test -fuzz=FuzzParseInput -fuzztime=30s

HTTP Handler Tests

func TestHandler(t *testing.T) {
    srv := NewServer(mockDeps)

    req := httptest.NewRequest("GET", "/api/users/123", nil)
    w := httptest.NewRecorder()

    srv.ServeHTTP(w, req)

    if w.Code != http.StatusOK {
        t.Errorf("status = %d, want %d", w.Code, http.StatusOK)
    }
}

Golden Files

var update = flag.Bool("update", false, "update golden files")

func TestRender(t *testing.T) {
    got := Render(input)
    golden := filepath.Join("testdata", t.Name()+".golden")

    if *update {
        if err := os.WriteFile(golden, got, 0644); err != nil {
            t.Fatalf("writing golden file: %v", err)
        }
    }

    want, err := os.ReadFile(golden)
    if err != nil {
        t.Fatalf("reading golden file: %v (run with -update to create)", err)
    }
    if !bytes.Equal(got, want) {
        t.Errorf("output mismatch:\ngot:\n%s\nwant:\n%s", got, want)
    }
}

Anti-Patterns

1. Testing Internal Implementation

// BAD - tests private state
func TestUser(t *testing.T) {
    u := NewUser("alice")
    if u.id != 1 {  // testing internal field
        t.Error("wrong id")
    }
}

// GOOD - tests behavior
func TestUser(t *testing.T) {
    u := NewUser("alice")
    if u.ID() != 1 {
        t.Error("wrong ID")
    }
}

2. Shared Mutable State

// BAD - tests interfere with each other
var testDB = setupDB()

func TestA(t *testing.T) {
    t.Parallel()
    testDB.Insert(...)  // race!
}

// GOOD - isolated per test
func TestA(t *testing.T) {
    db := setupTestDB(t)
    t.Cleanup(func() { db.Close() })
    db.Insert(...)
}

3. Assertions Without Context

// BAD
assert.Equal(t, want, got)  // "expected X got Y" - which test?

// GOOD
assert.Equal(t, want, got, "user name after update")

When to Load References

  • Reviewing test file structure → structure.md
  • Reviewing mock implementations → mocking.md

Review Questions

  1. Are tests table-driven with named cases?
  2. Do error messages include input, got, and want?
  3. Are parallel tests isolated (no shared state)?
  4. Is cleanup done via t.Cleanup?
  5. Do tests verify behavior, not implementation?

Files

3 total
Select a file
Select a file to preview.

Comments

Loading comments…