ClawHub

Game Design Five Options

v1.0.0

Generate and compare at least five game design solution options for a feature, system, UX issue, live-ops problem, or design challenge. Use when several idea...

⭐ 0· 95·0 current·0 all-time
byStanislav Stankovic@stanestane

Install

OpenClaw Prompt Flow

Install with OpenClaw

Best for remote or guided setup. Copy the exact prompt, then paste it into OpenClaw for stanestane/game-design-five-options.

Previewing Install & Setup.
Prompt PreviewInstall & Setup
Install the skill "Game Design Five Options" (stanestane/game-design-five-options) from ClawHub.
Skill page: https://clawhub.ai/stanestane/game-design-five-options
Keep the work scoped to this skill only.
After install, inspect the skill metadata and help me finish setup.
Use only the metadata you can verify from ClawHub; do not invent missing requirements.
Ask before making any broader environment changes.

Command Line

CLI Commands

Use the direct CLI path if you want to install manually and keep every step visible.

OpenClaw CLI

Bare skill slug

openclaw skills install game-design-five-options

ClawHub CLI

Package manager switcher

npx clawhub@latest install game-design-five-options
Security Scan
VirusTotalVirusTotal
Benign
View report →
OpenClawOpenClaw
Benign
high confidence
✓
Purpose & Capability
The skill's name and description match the SKILL.md: it generates and compares five distinct game-design options. It does not request unrelated capabilities (no cloud creds, no binaries).
✓
Instruction Scope
Runtime instructions are limited to generating problem statements, five options, pros/cons, comparisons, and a recommendation. The only file the instructions reference is the bundled references/family-conventions.md; there are no instructions to read arbitrary user files, access system config, or call external endpoints.
✓
Install Mechanism
No install spec or code files are present. This is an instruction-only skill, so nothing is downloaded or written to disk during install.
✓
Credentials
The skill declares no required environment variables, credentials, or config paths, which is appropriate for a purely advisory/design skill.
✓
Persistence & Privilege
always is false and the skill does not request elevated or persistent presence. It follows normal, expected invocation behavior for a user-invocable design helper.
Assessment
This skill is an instruction-only game-design brainstorming/comparison tool and appears coherent with its stated purpose. It asks for no credentials or installs, and only references the included conventions file. Before using: do not paste sensitive or private design-doc secrets into prompts (the model output may be logged); validate any recommended designs with engineering/product constraints in your environment; and remember the quality of results depends on prompt quality and the LLM's knowledge—treat outputs as starting points, not final specs.

Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.

latestvk9726b5t6d3736qh9bp7krm10x8588st
95downloads
0stars
1versions
Updated 6d ago
v1.0.0
MIT-0
Stanislav Stankovic@stanestane
latest
Download

Game Design Five Options

Force the design space open before it closes too early.

Use this skill when a team already has ideas and needs a structured way to compare them. The aim is to avoid premature convergence by putting several options side by side, then assessing their differences in value, cost, and risk.

Read references/family-conventions.md when you need the shared conventions for this GROW-derived skill family.

What to produce

Generate:

  1. Problem statement - what needs solving
  2. Five options - distinct solution directions
  3. Pros and cons - the upside and downside of each
  4. Rough comparison - impact, cost, and fit
  5. Recommendation - the best option or best test candidate

Process

1. Define the problem

State clearly what outcome the options are trying to achieve.

2. Generate five distinct options

Push for real differences, not five tiny variations of the same idea.

3. Evaluate each option

For each one, describe:

  • summary
  • strengths
  • weaknesses
  • expected player impact
  • implementation difficulty
  • strategic fit

Optional: include SWOT-style notes if useful.

4. Prioritize

Recommend:

  • the best immediate choice
  • the fastest testable version
  • any options that should be discarded or held for later

Response structure

Problem

  • ...

Five Options

  1. ...
  2. ...
  3. ...
  4. ...
  5. ...

Comparison

  • ...

Recommendation

  • ...

Fast mode

  • What are five credible ways to solve this?
  • Which one is strongest now?
  • Which one is cheapest to test?

Working principle

There is almost always more than one viable answer. Make the alternatives visible.

Comments

Loading comments...