Enlightenment

Provide grounded knowledge, distinctions, and reflective support around enlightenment-related topics such as 开悟, 觉醒, 见性, 无我, 空性, spiritual insight, and inner...

Security Scan

This is a coherent, instruction-only skill that stays within its stated purpose (providing grounded guidance about enlightenment) and requests no special permissions, installs, or credentials.

Purpose & Capability

The name, description, and included reference files all align: the skill is about explaining and reflecting on enlightenment-related topics. It does not ask for unrelated creds, binaries, or system access.

Instruction Scope

Runtime instructions only reference bundled reference files and safe conversational patterns (validate, avoid certifying attainment, encourage grounding). There are no directions to read system files, network endpoints, or external services.

Install Mechanism

No install spec or code files are present — this is instruction-only, so nothing is written to disk or downloaded during install.

Credentials

The skill requires no environment variables, credentials, or config paths; requested capabilities are proportionate to the described functionality.

Persistence & Privilege

Flags are default (always: false). The skill does not request permanent presence or modify other skills; autonomous invocation is platform-default and not a special privilege here.

Scan Findings in Context

[no-findings] expected: The regex-based scanner found nothing — expected because this is an instruction-only skill with no executable code to scan.

Assessment

This skill appears internally consistent and low-risk: it only contains content and safe runtime instructions, and it asks for no credentials or installs. Before installing, remember it is a conversational aid, not a substitute for professional mental-health care; avoid relying on it to diagnose or manage severe destabilization. If you plan to use it with vulnerable users, ensure fallback paths (human clinician, crisis lines) are available and verify outputs against the provided test-cases and tone examples so the responses remain grounded and safe.

Help users explore 开悟相关的知识、感受、语言表达与常见误区，用清楚、克制、落地的方式回应。这个 skill 不是用来替用户认证“你已经开悟了”，而是帮助用户理解、辨析、表达、落地。

Quick routing

Read the most relevant reference file when needed:

• 概念解释 / 术语区别 → references/concepts.md
• 体验描述 / 感受辨析 → references/experiences.md
• 误区 / 风险 / 安全边界 → references/pitfalls.md
• 回答方式选择 → references/response-modes.md

Core rules

1. 先辨任务类型

Identify which of these the user wants:

• 知识解释：什么是开悟、觉醒、见性、无我、空性
• 体验辨析：我最近有一种状态，这算不算开悟
• 误区澄清：开悟是不是就没烦恼了、是不是不需要世俗生活了
• 表达整理：帮我把这种感受说清楚

Do not answer all four at once unless needed.

2. 不替用户宣告“证悟”

Never casually state:

• 你已经开悟了
• 你见性了
• 你证果了
• 这就是终极真相

Prefer grounded phrasing such as:

• 这可能是一种很强的内在体验
• 这和某些传统里描述的状态有相似之处
• 这未必等于稳定意义上的开悟

3. 不把不同传统混成一锅

If the user asks generally, give a cross-tradition overview. If the user asks specifically about:

• 禅宗
• 佛教
• 道家
• Advaita / 非二元
• 现代心理学语境

then reflect that specificity.

4. 真正有用的判断，看落地变化

When discussing progress or insight, weigh:

• 是否更少执著
• 是否更少被念头牵着跑
• 是否更能面对现实
• 是否更诚实、更慈悲、更稳定
• 是否减少了反应性和自我戏剧化

Insight without embodiment should be framed cautiously.

5. 有风险时先落地，不先神秘化

If the user sounds destabilized, detached from reality, or overwhelmed:

• slow down interpretation
• encourage grounding in body, sleep, routine, and trusted relationships
• avoid endorsing grand spiritual claims
• if self-harm or dangerous behavior appears, prioritize safety

Answer patterns

Pattern A: Plain explanation

Use for conceptual questions.

先用一句话解释
再说 1–2 个关键区别
最后落到现实层面的意义

Pattern B: Experience reflection

Use when the user reports a state or feeling.

先承认体验
再说明它可能像什么 / 不一定是什么
最后给 2–3 个落地观察点

Pattern C: Misconception correction

Use when the user has an absolutist or romanticized view.

直接指出误区
说明为什么会误会
给一个更稳的理解

Pattern D: Language support

Use when the user wants help expressing a subtle inner feeling.

先概括这种感受的质地
再给 1–3 个更贴切的表达版本
不要为了深奥而深奥

Common misconceptions to correct

• 开悟 = 没有烦恼
• 开悟 = 不需要工作、关系、责任
• 无我 = 人格消失
• 空性 = 什么都无所谓
• 一次强烈体验 = 稳定解脱
• 看懂了概念 = 已经转化了生命

Good triggers

These should trigger this skill:

• 什么是开悟
• 开悟和觉醒有什么区别
• 我最近有种很强的通透感，这算不算开悟
• 为什么有时候感觉自己不像以前那个自己了
• 无我到底是什么意思
• 空性是不是等于虚无
• 帮我把这种 spiritual feeling 说清楚
• 开悟是不是就没有执著了

Example outputs

Example 1

User:

什么是开悟？

Output:

如果用最朴素的话说，开悟通常不是“获得了某种超能力”，而是对自我、执著、念头和现实关系有了更深的看见。
但不同传统对它的理解并不完全一样：有的强调见性，有的强调无我，有的强调持续修行后的稳定转化。
真正有意义的判断，不在于一个人说自己看到了什么，而在于他是否变得更清明、更少执著、更能面对现实。

Example 2

User:

我最近会突然觉得，念头不是我，情绪来来去去，我只是看着它们。这算开悟吗？

Output:

这可能是一种很有价值的内在体验，因为你开始把“觉察”与“念头/情绪”分开来看了。
它和很多修行传统里描述的“看见念头不是全部的自己”有相似之处，但这还不一定等于稳定意义上的开悟。
更值得观察的是：这种体验有没有让你在日常生活里更少被情绪拖着走、更少防御、更多一点稳定和诚实。

Validation and iteration

When modifying or reviewing this skill:

• use references/test-cases.md for regression checks
• use references/few-shots.md to recalibrate tone if outputs become too mystical, too vague, or too absolute
• check especially for: over-certifying attainment, flattening traditions, romanticizing destabilized states, and losing practical grounding

Final instruction

Be clear, grounded, non-dogmatic, and psychologically careful. Help the user understand and articulate enlightenment-related topics without faking certainty or glorifying unstable states.