ADK Skill Patterns
v1.0.05 proven agent skill design patterns (Tool Wrapper, Generator, Reviewer, Inversion, Pipeline) from Google's ADK. Build reliable, composable skills with templ...
Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.
License
Runtime requirements
SKILL.md
ADK Skill Patterns 🧩
Source: Google Cloud Tech — 5 Agent Skill Design Patterns
Adapted for: OpenClaw Agent System
Purpose: Build reliable, composable agent skills using proven architectural patterns
Overview
The specification explains how to package a skill, but offers zero guidance on how to structure the logic inside it. These 5 patterns solve that problem.
| Pattern | Question It Answers | Use When |
|---|---|---|
| Tool Wrapper | "How do I make my agent an expert on a specific library?" | Agent needs deep, contextual knowledge about a technology |
| Generator | "How do I enforce consistent output structure?" | Output format must be predictable every time |
| Reviewer | "How do I separate what to check from how to check it?" | Code review, quality gates, compliance checking |
| Inversion | "How do I stop the agent from guessing and gather requirements first?" | Complex tasks requiring full context before execution |
| Pipeline | "How do I enforce a strict multi-step workflow?" | Multi-phase tasks with checkpoints and approvals |
Pattern 1: Tool Wrapper
Purpose: Give your agent on-demand context for a specific library/framework.
Mechanism:
- Listens for library keywords in prompts
- Dynamically loads documentation from
references/ - Applies conventions as absolute truth only when needed
Example Use Cases:
- FastAPI conventions
- Internal coding standards
- Framework-specific best practices
- API design guidelines
Template: See templates/tool-wrapper-SKILL.md
Pattern 2: Generator
Purpose: Enforce consistent output via fill-in-the-blank orchestration.
Mechanism:
assets/holds output templatereferences/holds style guide- Instructions act as project manager
- Asks for missing variables before generating
Example Use Cases:
- API documentation generation
- Standardized commit messages
- Project scaffolding
- Technical reports
Template: See templates/generator-SKILL.md
Pattern 3: Reviewer
Purpose: Separate review criteria from review execution.
Mechanism:
- Stores modular rubric in
references/review-checklist.md - Methodically scores submissions
- Groups findings by severity
- Swap checklist = completely different audit
Example Use Cases:
- PR review automation
- Security vulnerability scanning
- Code quality audits
- Compliance checking
Template: See templates/reviewer-SKILL.md
Pattern 4: Inversion
Purpose: Stop agents from guessing — make them interview first.
Mechanism:
- Agent acts as interviewer, not executor
- Structured questions in phases
- Hard gates prevent premature synthesis
- User drives through answers, not prompts
Example Use Cases:
- Project planning/requirements gathering
- System design interviews
- Complex task specification
- Knowledge extraction
Template: See templates/inversion-SKILL.md
Pattern 5: Pipeline
Purpose: Enforce strict sequential workflow with hard checkpoints.
Mechanism:
- Instructions = workflow definition
- Diamond gate conditions (user approval required)
- Cannot bypass steps or present unvalidated results
- Progressive disclosure keeps context clean
Example Use Cases:
- Documentation generation workflows
- Multi-step code generation
- Complex build/deploy pipelines
- Research synthesis workflows
Template: See templates/pipeline-SKILL.md
Decision Tree
START: What does your skill need to do?
│
├─→ Provide deep knowledge about a specific library/framework?
│ └─→ Use: TOOL WRAPPER
│
├─→ Produce consistent, templated output?
│ └─→ Use: GENERATOR
│
├─→ Check/audit something against criteria?
│ └─→ Use: REVIEWER
│
├─→ Gather requirements before acting?
│ └─→ Use: INVERSION
│
├─→ Execute strict multi-step workflow?
│ └─→ Use: PIPELINE
│
└─→ Multiple of the above?
└─→ Patterns COMPOSE (see below)
Pattern Composition
These patterns are not mutually exclusive — they compose:
| Combination | Effect |
|---|---|
| Pipeline + Reviewer | Multi-step workflow with quality gate at the end |
| Generator + Inversion | Gather variables via interview, then fill template |
| Pipeline + Tool Wrapper | Each step loads specific expertise as needed |
| Reviewer + Generator | Review output before generating final document |
Principle: Your agent only spends context tokens on the exact patterns it needs at runtime.
Quick Reference: Pattern Selection
| Scenario | Pattern | Why |
|---|---|---|
| "Teach my agent FastAPI conventions" | Tool Wrapper | Context loads only when FastAPI mentioned |
| "Generate consistent API docs" | Generator | Template + style guide = predictable output |
| "Automate PR reviews" | Reviewer | Swap checklist for different audit types |
| "Plan a new project" | Inversion | Gathers full requirements before designing |
| "Generate docs from code" | Pipeline | Parse → Generate → Review → Assemble |
Directory Structure
skills/
└── your-skill/
├── SKILL.md # Instructions (implements pattern)
├── references/ # Knowledge, checklists, style guides
│ ├── conventions.md
│ ├── review-checklist.md
│ └── style-guide.md
└── assets/ # Templates, examples
├── report-template.md
└── plan-template.md
Anti-Patterns to Avoid
❌ Cramming everything into system prompt — Use Tool Wrapper instead
❌ Different output every run — Use Generator for consistency
❌ Hardcoded review criteria — Use Reviewer for modularity
❌ Agent assumes context — Use Inversion to gather requirements
❌ Skipped steps in workflows — Use Pipeline for enforcement
Implementation Notes for OpenClaw
- File Loading: Use
readtool to load references/assets dynamically - Pattern Detection: Check user's intent to determine which pattern to apply
- Composition: Chain skills via
sessions_spawnfor complex workflows - Gates: Explicit user confirmation before proceeding (especially Pipeline/Inversion)
Using This Skill
To Apply a Pattern
Ask me: "Use the [pattern-name] pattern to [task]"
Examples:
- "Use the Tool Wrapper pattern to create a FastAPI expert skill"
- "Use the Generator pattern to standardize my report outputs"
- "Use the Reviewer pattern to build a code quality checker"
- "Use the Inversion pattern to plan my new project"
- "Use the Pipeline pattern to create a documentation workflow"
To Get Pattern Advice
Ask: "Which pattern should I use for [scenario]?"
To Compose Patterns
Ask: "How do I combine [pattern-1] and [pattern-2]?"
Source Article: https://x.com/GoogleCloudTech/status/2033953579824758855
Last Updated: March 29, 2026
Files
7 totalComments
Loading comments…
