Pre-Mortem Analyst
Imagine the project already failed, then work backward to find why. More powerful than risk assessment because it assumes failure is certain. Use when user says "pre-mortem", "premortem", "imagine this failed", "what could go wrong", "risk analysis", "before we launch", "stress test", "what would kill this", "project risks".
MIT-0 · Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
⭐ 4 · 2.8k · 13 current installs · 13 all-time installs
MIT-0
Security Scan
OpenClaw
Benign
high confidencePurpose & Capability
The name/description (pre-mortem analysis) matches the contents: facilitation steps, templates, examples, and frameworks for imagining failure. There are no unrelated requirements (no env vars, binaries, or installs) that would be unexpected for this purpose.
Instruction Scope
SKILL.md and reference docs provide step-by-step facilitation guidance, output templates, examples, and monitoring suggestions. The instructions do not tell the agent to read files, access environment variables, contact external endpoints, or collect system data beyond the user-provided project context.
Install Mechanism
No install spec or code files that would be written to disk or executed are present. Being instruction-only minimizes supply-chain/code-execution risk.
Credentials
The skill requests no environment variables, credentials, or config paths. This is proportionate for a facilitation/analysis skill that only needs user-provided project context.
Persistence & Privilege
always is false and default autonomous invocation is unchanged. The skill does not request persistent presence, system modification, or access to other skills' config.
Assessment
This skill is instruction-only and internally consistent with being a pre-mortem facilitator. It does not request credentials or install code, so supply-chain and credential-exfiltration risks are low. However, be cautious about the project data you paste into any third-party model or agent — do not include secrets, credentials, or sensitive PII in prompts. If you plan to run pre-mortems on proprietary projects, confirm how your agent/provider handles and stores prompt content and consider running initial tests with redacted or synthetic data. Lastly, review the examples/templates to ensure the output format and level of detail match your team's needs before using it in a live workshop.Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.
Current versionv1.0.0
Download ziplatest
License
MIT-0
Free to use, modify, and redistribute. No attribution required.
SKILL.md
Pre-Mortem Analyst
Why Pre-Mortem > Risk Assessment
Risk Assessment: "What MIGHT go wrong?" → Optimism bias filters answers Pre-Mortem: "It's 6 months later. It FAILED. Why?" → Liberates honest analysis
Research: Pre-mortems increase problem identification by 30%.
The Process
- Set the scene: "It's [date]. This has failed completely."
- Brainstorm causes: List 10+ failure reasons (no filtering)
- Categorize: People, Process, Technology, External
- Rate: Likelihood × Impact (H/M/L)
- Prevent: Top 3 get specific mitigation actions
- Monitor: Define early warning signs
Output Format
PROJECT: [Name]
FAILURE SCENARIO: "It's [date]. [Project] has completely failed."
WHY IT FAILED:
👥 PEOPLE: [Cause] - L×I: H/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
⚙️ PROCESS: [Cause] - L×I: M/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
💻 TECHNOLOGY: [Cause] - L×I: L/H | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
🌍 EXTERNAL: [Cause] - L×I: M/M | Prevent: [x] | Warning: [y]
TOP 3 PRIORITIES:
1. [Risk] → [Specific action]
2. [Risk] → [Specific action]
3. [Risk] → [Specific action]
WARNING SIGNS TO MONITOR:
□ [Early indicator 1]
□ [Early indicator 2]
Common Failure Categories
| Category | Common Causes |
|---|---|
| People | Key person leaves, skill gaps, misalignment, low buy-in |
| Process | Aggressive timeline, scope creep, dependency issues |
| Tech | Doesn't scale, integration fails, security breach |
| External | Market shift, competitor move, regulation change |
Integration
Compounds with:
- inversion-strategist → Create systematic avoidance strategies
- second-order-consequences → Project impact of prevented failures
- first-principles-decomposer → Question hidden assumptions
- mspot-generator → Validate MSPOT projects before committing
See references/examples.md for Artem-specific pre-mortems
Files
3 totalSelect a file
Select a file to preview.
Comments
Loading comments…
