Claude Code Agent Teams
Coordinate multiple Claude Code agents to work in parallel on independent tasks like multi-lens reviews, debugging, and full-stack features with defined file...
Like a lobster shell, security has layers — review code before you run it.
License
SKILL.md
Claude Code Agent Teams
Orchestrate multiple Claude Code agents working together on complex tasks. Agents coordinate through a shared task list, message each other directly, and work in parallel on independent scopes.
When to Use
✅ Use for parallel independent work:
- Multi-lens code reviews (security, performance, tests in parallel)
- Debugging with competing hypotheses (test theories simultaneously)
- Full-stack features (frontend/backend/tests by separate specialists)
- Architecture decisions (adversarial debate produces stronger ADRs)
- Cross-domain investigations (bottleneck analysis across systems)
- Data-parallel work (inventory classification, bulk refactoring)
❌ Don't use for:
- Sequential work with tight dependencies
- Same-file edits (conflict risk)
- Simple tasks (coordination overhead > benefit)
- Learning/exploration (single agent with full context is better)
Rule of thumb: Teams multiply token cost 3-4x. Use only when parallelization benefit exceeds coordination overhead.
Quick Start
1. Enable Feature
Environment variable:
export CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1
Or settings file (~/.claude/settings.json):
{
"env": {
"CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS": "1"
}
}
2. Validate Setup
./scripts/validate-setup.sh
Checks for: env var set, claude CLI available, tmux installed (optional).
3. Pick Template
| Template | Use Case |
|---|---|
parallel-review.md | Multi-lens code review (security + performance + tests) |
competing-hypotheses.md | Debug by testing competing theories |
fullstack-feature.md | Frontend/backend/tests coordination |
architecture-decision.md | ADR with adversarial debate |
bottleneck-analysis.md | Cross-domain performance investigation |
inventory-classification.md | Data-parallel classification/refactoring |
Each template includes: when to use, team structure, copy-paste spawn prompt, expected outcomes.
4. Spawn Team
claude --pty
# Paste spawn prompt from template
Monitor with ./scripts/team-monitor.sh (separate terminal) or Ctrl+T (in Claude Code).
Core Principles
- Clear file boundaries - Each teammate owns different files/directories (prevents conflicts)
- Use delegate mode - Lead coordinates, teammates implement (include in spawn prompt)
- Size tasks appropriately - 5-6 self-contained tasks per teammate
- Wait for completion - Don't let lead merge results while teammates are mid-task
- Start with research - Spawn researchers before builders to establish shared understanding
Cost Management
Agent teams multiply token usage 3-4x vs single session. Each teammate has its own context window.
Optimize with:
- Model mixing - Opus for lead (strategic), Sonnet for teammates (tactical) = ~40% savings
- Minimize broadcasts - Direct messages only (broadcasts copy to all teammates)
- Right-size teams - 3 teammates usually optimal; 6+ only for highly parallel work
See references/cost-management.md for detailed strategies.
Troubleshooting
Teammates not spawning?
- Verify
CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1is set - Restart Claude Code after setting env var
File conflicts?
- Define explicit file boundaries in spawn prompt (directory-level ownership)
Lead implementing instead of coordinating?
- Add "Use delegate mode: coordinate but don't implement" to spawn prompt
- Or press Shift+Tab to cycle into delegate mode
See references/troubleshooting.md for full list.
Automation
Monitor progress:
./scripts/team-monitor.sh
Cleanup (graceful shutdown):
./scripts/team-cleanup.sh
Display Modes
In-process (default) - All teammates in main terminal
Shift+Up/Down- Select teammateCtrl+T- Toggle task listEscape- Interrupt teammate
Split-pane (requires tmux or iTerm2) - Each teammate gets own pane
- Set
teammateMode: "tmux"in~/.claude/settings.json
References
templates/- 6 copy-paste ready spawn prompts with usage guidancescripts/- Automation helpers (validate, monitor, cleanup)references/best-practices.md- When to use teams, task sizing, file boundariesreferences/cost-management.md- Token optimization strategiesreferences/troubleshooting.md- Common issues and solutionsexamples/- Real-world walkthroughs (PR review, bug hunt, feature build)
Comparison
| Approach | Best For |
|---|---|
| Single session | Sequential work, exploration |
| Agent teams (this skill) | Parallel independent tasks with coordination |
| OpenClaw subagents | Background work, long-running tasks |
Contributing
Found a useful pattern? Submit PR with:
- Template or example
- When to use + team structure
- Spawn prompt + expected outcomes
Credits
Built with insights from Claude Code documentation, ClaudeFast patterns, and OpenClaw community.
Repository: https://github.com/matthew-a-gordon/claude-code-teams
License: MIT
Files
13 totalComments
Loading comments…
