{"skill":{"slug":"critical-writing","displayName":"critical-writing","summary":"多角色辩论写作工作流。通过\"前置三问 → 规划 → 分步写作 → 辩论法庭 → 综合改写\" 的闭环流程，让多个批评者角色互相对抗，在争论中打磨出高质量内容。 核心差异：不是单个名人单向批评，而是 2-3 个批评者就同一篇稿子展开辩论—— 一方指出问题，另一方反驳或补充，最终从争论中提炼出真正有价值的改写方向。 触...","tags":{"latest":"1.0.0"},"stats":{"comments":0,"downloads":106,"installsAllTime":0,"installsCurrent":0,"stars":0,"versions":1},"createdAt":1778254185578,"updatedAt":1778492880688},"latestVersion":{"version":"1.0.0","createdAt":1778254185578,"changelog":"Major update: Adds a full, multi-step, multi-critic debate-based writing workflow.\n\n- 引入完整闭环流程：“前置三问 → 规划 → 分步写作 → 辩论法庭 → 综合改写 → 交付”\n- 写作模块明确：每一步都要等待用户确认，全流程不可跳步\n- 核心创新：2-3 个风格迥异批评者对稿件进行辩论、反驳和仲裁，推动高质量改写\n- 强制引入批评者档案与“辩论触发词”，确保批评有据、有张力\n- 仲裁分清共识与分歧，改写时尊重多方意见，由用户参与最终决策\n- 明确适用范围与触发场景，强调正式和协作式写作","license":"MIT-0"},"metadata":{"os":null,"systems":null},"owner":{"handle":"boboy-j","userId":"s17ckg9br2p4k5kx6cr8fc4jz5852pah","displayName":"boboy-j","image":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/257822985?v=4"},"moderation":null}