# Category Adaptations

Per-category voice guidance. The five-phase method (Discover → Define → Document → Deploy → Defend) is the same across categories; the **inputs, attributes, and tolerances change**.

If the user's category is not covered here — politics, religious organisations, defense, gaming, healthcare professional comms, adult content, sports teams, fintech-crypto — trigger Phase 2 (Research) before defining voice.

---

## Table of contents

- [B2B SaaS / Tech / Developer Tools](#b2b-saas--tech--developer-tools)
- [B2B Services / Consulting / Agency](#b2b-services--consulting--agency)
- [B2C / D2C Consumer Brands](#b2c--d2c-consumer-brands)
- [Non-profit / NGO](#non-profit--ngo)
- [Volunteering / Community Organisations](#volunteering--community-organisations)
- [Industrial / Manufacturing](#industrial--manufacturing)
- [Product-led Companies](#product-led-companies)
- [Personal Branding / Solopreneurs / Creators](#personal-branding--solopreneurs--creators)
- [Public Sector / Government](#public-sector--government)
- [Categories requiring deep research](#categories-requiring-deep-research)

---

## B2B SaaS / Tech / Developer Tools

**Reference brands:** Stripe, Linear, Notion, Mailchimp, Slack.

**Buyer is a committee.** Champion, economic buyer, technical evaluator, end-user, security/procurement — the same voice must produce content credible to all five. The 2025 10Fold survey reports 39% of B2B marketers identify maintaining voice and quality as a top challenge.

**Default attribute set:**

- Plainspoken expertise (avoid jargon for marketing top-of-funnel; allow for technical docs)
- Confident but not cocky
- Specific over abstract (named opinions, original POV)

**Watch for:**

- "Empower teams", "supercharge", "next-generation", "AI-powered", "leverage" — ban explicitly. These phrases are LLM-bait and signal lack of distinct POV.
- Generic AI-generated thought leadership is the new "spray and pray". Original perspective is the moat.
- Product UI strings are upstream of marketing voice. Linear and Notion treat them as brand copy. If product writing and marketing writing don't coordinate, two voices emerge.

**Pitfall:** writing for the SVP buyer while ignoring the engineer end-user creates two voices. Either pick one and modulate, or formally split (Stripe does both: dev docs vs marketing).

---

## B2B Services / Consulting / Agency

**Voice substitutes for product.** Buyers cannot test the service before purchase; voice is the proof of competence and culture-fit.

**Default attribute set:**

- Demonstrably expert without preaching (Sage with Caregiver substrate)
- Specific case-study language; never abstract "transformation" prose
- Warm but never matey

**Watch for:**

- Voice of partners matters. Agencies are bought as a partner-by-partner decision; the firm voice and partner voices must be coherent, not identical.
- "We help organisations transform their operations through data-driven insights" — ban this sentence shape across all consulting clients. It is the single most common cliché in the category.

**Pitfall:** humour rarely translates outside specific category niches (creative agencies, DTC strategists). Irreverence reads as unprofessional in management consulting, accounting, or law.

---

## B2C / D2C Consumer Brands

**Reference brands:** Oatly, Liquid Death, Innocent, Wendy's, Patagonia.

**Voice is a brand asset and a moat.** Distinctive voices have built billion-dollar D2C trajectories. But distinctiveness must be earned, not borrowed. Per Do Words Good: _"customers are able to spot brands that are riffing on other brands' voices."_

**Default attribute set:**

- Boldly distinctive (willing to alienate non-buyers)
- One archetype lean (rare to span more than one + adjacent)
- High-frequency lexicon (catchphrases, named concepts)

**Watch for:**

- **Wackaging** (Nick Asbury, 2011) — the "chatty, matey" tone Innocent invented in 2000 and dozens of brands copied. A copied voice is a discount voice. Lucie Bright (former Innocent copywriter), The Guardian, 2014: _"To be honest, we were mucking about when we started... We've always talked to everyone in the same way we talk to our friends, but with fewer swear words."_
- **Be willing to alienate.** Liquid Death founder Mike Cessario explicitly designed against polished bottled-water norms. _"We're just a funny beverage company who hates corporate marketing as much as you do."_

**Pitfall:** the "we want to sound like Oatly" brief. The strategy underneath the style is the differentiator, not the surface style. Borrowed voices age fast as audiences detect the imitation.

---

## Non-profit / NGO

**Reference brand:** charity: water.

**Voice carries the moral case.** Scott Harrison (charity: water founder) built the voice around hope rather than guilt: _"I saw charities using shame and guilt to manipulate people into giving."_

**Default attribute set:**

- Hope-led, not guilt-led
- Concrete protagonist over statistics
- Specific scene, specific name, specific number — abstraction kills donor empathy

**Watch for:**

- Voice differs across donor segments. Major-donor letters vs broad-appeal email vs grassroots social are three tones of one voice. Document each.
- Storytelling is the foundation. Tyler Riewer (charity: water content lead, former ad creative) brought ad-craft storytelling to the org.

**Pitfall:** mission drift in language. A 30-year-old org's voice has often calcified into jargon ("capacity building", "stakeholder engagement", "theory of change"). Audit annually and rewrite using the words actual beneficiaries use.

---

## Volunteering / Community Organisations

**Voice must be permissive.** People sign up to give time; a hectoring tone kills the funnel.

**Default attribute set:**

- Inviting, not prescriptive
- Reader's identity foregrounded ("you, who care about X"), not the org's mission
- Light on rules, strong on principles — chapter leaders in many cities cannot be policed centrally

**Watch for:**

- Equip chapter leaders with a one-page voice card and a banned-phrases glossary, not a 30-page guide.
- Founder voice often becomes the only voice — growth then requires a painful transition. Document the voice as detached from the founder early.

**Pitfall:** mission-statement language ("we believe that every person deserves...") in volunteer-facing copy. Volunteers are not donors; they want to know what they'll _do_, not what the org _believes_.

---

## Industrial / Manufacturing

**Reference brands:** Caterpillar, 3M.

**Reliability is a voice attribute.** Voice supports perceived safety, precision, and certainty. Industrial buyers distrust marketing prose.

**Default attribute set:**

- Plainspoken expertise
- Reliability-as-tone — short sentences, named specifications, no hedging
- Specifications and case studies as primary brand surfaces

**Watch for:**

- Most industrial brand voice work fails by treating spec sheets as off-limits. They are the brand. The font, sentence structure, and unit conventions of a spec sheet shape buyer perception more than the website does.
- Resist "B2B = boring" defaults. Caterpillar and 3M have invested in distinctive voice with real returns.

**Pitfall:** corporate-anonymous tone. The phrase "industry-leading solutions" is the death rattle of industrial brand voice.

---

## Product-led Companies

**Reference brands:** Duolingo, Linear, Notion, Slack.

**Product UI is the largest single voice surface.** Empty states, onboarding strings, error messages, button labels, confirmation dialogs see more impressions than any blog post.

**Default attribute set:**

- Functional first in-product; flourish moves to marketing
- Coordinated UX writing and brand writing (same owner or tight pairing)
- Mascot-led humour only where it doesn't bleed into transactional flows (Duolingo gets this right; most imitators don't)

**Watch for:**

- Modulation between marketing and in-product is the hardest call. Marketing can be playful; in-product must be functional first. NN/g's error-message walkthrough is the canonical teaching case.
- Slack's "Copy Principles" (Andrea Drugay) explicitly unify marketing, product, and partner-agency writing under one set of attributes.

**Pitfall:** mascot-led humour leaking into payment failures, account suspensions, security warnings. Wrong register in transactional copy destroys trust.

---

## Personal Branding / Solopreneurs / Creators

**Voice and person are the same thing.** No translation layer between brand and self.

**Default attribute set:**

- Captured phrases, not just attributes — solopreneur voices are recognisable by micro-tics (sentence openings, signature questions, sign-offs)
- One archetype lean
- Stable over time — re-platform without re-voicing

**Watch for:**

- Codify your voice for future delegation. When you hire your first ghostwriter or VA, you need a one-pager describing how you sound. Run NN/g 4-dimensions on yourself.
- Chasing platform-native norms (LinkedIn-isms, TikTok cadence) until the voice becomes platform-shaped rather than person-shaped is the most common failure mode.

**Pitfall:** the voice becomes a parody of itself when the creator outsources writing without first capturing the voice in a guide. Ghostwriters default to platform clichés.

---

## Public Sector / Government

**Reference brand:** GOV.UK.

**Clarity is a civic duty, not a stylistic choice.** GOV.UK's house position is that plain English is mandatory.

Sarah Richards (former GDS Head of Content Design), 2014: _"if we use a lot of adjectives and describing words, people will think it's spin... so we find that if we just write very plainly, very clearly, very directly, everybody understands."_

**Default attribute set:**

- Plain English (reading age of 9 is the inclusion principle, not infantilising)
- Politically neutral but never anonymous
- Specific actions, named services, no jargon, no Latin abbreviations
- Sentence length: average 15-20 words (Attorney General's Office UK Writing Style Guide, February 2015)

**Watch for:**

- Avoid contractions that confuse non-native readers. GOV.UK avoids negative contractions (don't, can't) for this reason.
- Banned-word list is the gold standard: replace "agenda" with "plan"; "deliver" with "make/create/provide"; "leverage" (unless financial) with "influence/use".
- Tone shifts by service (DVLA vs HMRC vs NHS) but voice principles do not.

**Pitfall:** writing for ministers rather than citizens. Build a review test that catches it (e.g. "would the reader at the bus stop understand this sentence?").

---

## Categories requiring deep research

The categories below have voice norms shaped by audience, regulation, and platform that override generic guidance. Trigger Phase 2 (Research) before defining voice for any of them.

| Category | Why research is required | Likely constraints |
| --- | --- | --- |
| **Political / Advocacy / Campaign** | Voice is a coalition signal; tells listeners which group they're in before content arrives. Trade-off between precision and reach is category-specific. Crisis tone is the default tone. Slogans, refrains, cadence are intentional. | Campaign finance laws; platform policy; faction signalling |
| **Religious organisations** | Voice carries doctrinal alignment; readership often spans devout and seekers, requiring careful modulation. | Doctrinal review processes; multi-language sensitivity; community norms |
| **Defense / Military / Veterans** | Voice norms vary by audience (active-duty vs veteran vs civilian recruit) and by national context. | OPSEC, classification, public-affairs review processes |
| **Gaming** | Audience-native register (gamer literacy varies by genre); platform constraints (Discord, Twitch, Reddit); rapid trend cycles. | Platform community norms; rating/age restrictions; rapidly shifting slang |
| **Healthcare professional comms** | Two registers (clinician-to-clinician vs clinician-to-patient); regulatory liability on claims. | FDA, MHRA, EMA review; medical claim substantiation; informed-consent language |
| **Adult content** | Platform constraints, age-gating, payment-processor restrictions; audience expectations vary by sub-category. | Payment processor TOS; platform AUP; age verification jurisdictions |
| **Sports teams / leagues** | Fan-identity voice mediated by team history; rival-team handling; player privacy. | Player likeness rights; league communication policy; fan tribalism |
| **Fintech / Crypto** | Regulatory landscape changes monthly; trust language is heavily scrutinised; community-native register on crypto. | FCA / SEC / MiFID II claims rules; FINRA promotion rules; community/forum norms |
| **Cannabis / Regulated substances** | Country-by-country legality; payment processor restrictions; advertising bans on major platforms. | Jurisdictional advertising bans; platform AUP; trust-and-safety reviews |
| **Insurance / Legal services** | Liability language; regulatory review; trust-vs-empathy balance. | State/national regulator review; ABA / SRA / Bar advertising rules |

**Research brief template** (passed to the Phase 2 sub-agent):

> Research current tone-of-voice norms for `<category>` brands in `<market>`. Cover: 1) typical voice attributes for the category; 2) common pitfalls and how audiences react to off-tone copy; 3) 2-3 reference brands with publicly observable voice patterns (cite primary sources); 4) regulatory, cultural, or platform constraints on voice. Report in under 700 words with sources cited inline.
