Shadows Deep Research

4-round deep research protocol — Explorer, Devil's Advocate, Multi-Perspective Synthesis, Crystallize. Use for major architectural decisions, technology choi...

Security Scan

An instruction-only, four‑round research protocol that is internally consistent with its description and requests no elevated permissions, installs, or secrets.

Purpose & Capability

The name/description (deep research for architecture/tech decisions) matches the SKILL.md protocol and required resources: it's purely procedural and requests no binaries, env vars, or config paths.

Instruction Scope

The runtime instructions stay within the stated purpose (four rounds of research, synthesis, and citation). The SKILL.md claims 'zero network access' but also says it will be 'evidence-based' and use the agent's built-in search tools — a minor ambiguity about whether the agent will perform remote searches. This is not a security violation, but you should understand that fulfilling the 'evidence-based' rule depends on the agent platform's search capability.

Install Mechanism

No install spec and no code files — instruction-only skill with no on-disk installation risk.

Credentials

No environment variables, credentials, or config paths are requested; requested access is proportionate to the stated function.

Persistence & Privilege

always is false, the skill is user-invocable and does not request permanent presence or system configuration changes.

Assessment

This skill is instruction-only and coherent with its description: it asks the agent to run a 4-round research process and requires no installs, secrets, or filesystem access. Before using it, confirm how your platform's 'built-in search' works (queries may go to external search services) and avoid submitting proprietary secrets or sensitive data as part of prompts. If you care about provenance, verify the cited sources the agent provides and consider running any recommended PoCs in an isolated environment. Lastly, note the skill's author/homepage metadata is external — if you want greater assurance, check that external link and the publisher's reputation.

Deep Research — 4-Round Exploration Protocol

Version: 1.1.0 | Author: Shadows Company | License: MIT

---

WHEN TO TRIGGER

• Major architectural decision (monolith vs microservices, framework choice)
• Technology evaluation (comparing databases, languages, cloud providers)
• Strategic planning requiring deep analysis
• User says "deep research", "explore deeply", "analyze thoroughly"
• Complex problem with no obvious solution

WHEN NOT TO TRIGGER

• Simple factual questions
• Quick bug fixes or small code changes
• User wants a fast answer, not a deep dive

---

PREREQUISITES

No binaries required. This skill uses only the agent's reasoning and search capabilities. It does not execute code, access the filesystem, or require any external tools.

---

PROTOCOL — 4 ROUNDS

Round 1 — EXPLORER

Goal: Map the landscape exhaustively.

1. Search for existing solutions, papers, articles, repos
2. Identify all major approaches and frameworks
3. List key players, tools, and technologies
4. Note emerging trends and experimental approaches
5. Collect data points: performance, adoption, community size

Output: Landscape map with 5-10 options discovered.

Round 2 — DEVIL'S ADVOCATE

Goal: Stress-test every option ruthlessly.

For each option from Round 1:

1. What could go wrong? (failure modes)
2. What are the hidden costs? (maintenance, vendor lock-in, learning curve)
3. What are the scaling limits?
4. Who tried it and failed? Why?
5. What does the opposition say?

Output: Risk matrix — each option with 3-5 identified weaknesses.

Round 3 — MULTI-PERSPECTIVE SYNTHESIS

Goal: Evaluate from 5 different viewpoints.

Analyze remaining options through these lenses:

1. Engineer: Technical merit, DX, testability, performance
2. Architect: Scalability, extensibility, integration patterns
3. Product: Time-to-market, user impact, iteration speed
4. Security: Attack surface, data flow, compliance
5. Business: Cost, hiring market, ecosystem maturity

Output: Perspective matrix — scores per option per viewpoint.

Round 4 — CRYSTALLIZE

Goal: Produce a clear, actionable recommendation.

1. Synthesize all rounds into a decision framework
2. Rank final options with explicit scoring criteria
3. Declare a primary recommendation with confidence level
4. Define a fallback option
5. List concrete next steps (PoC tasks, benchmarks to run)

Output: Decision document with recommendation + action plan.

---

RULES

1. Complete all 4 rounds — never skip, even if answer seems obvious early
2. Evidence-based — every claim must cite a source or data point
3. Contrarian thinking — actively seek arguments against your preferred option
4. No premature convergence — Round 1-2 must remain open, narrowing only in Round 3-4
5. Actionable output — final round must include concrete next steps

---

SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS

This is a pure reasoning and analysis skill. It has zero code execution, zero network access, zero file modification, and zero persistence. The agent uses only its reasoning capabilities and available search tools to gather and synthesize information. This skill carries the lowest possible risk profile.

• Commands executed: None
• Data read: None (agent reasoning only)
• Network access: Only via agent's built-in search tools (not direct)
• Persistence: None
• Credentials: None required

---

OUTPUT FORMAT

# Deep Research: [Topic]

## Round 1 — Landscape
[Options discovered with brief descriptions]

## Round 2 — Stress Test
[Risk matrix for each option]

## Round 3 — Multi-Perspective Analysis
| Option | Engineer | Architect | Product | Security | Business |
|--------|----------|-----------|---------|----------|----------|
| ...    | ...      | ...       | ...     | ...      | ...      |

## Round 4 — Recommendation
**Primary**: [Option] (Confidence: X/10)
**Fallback**: [Option]
**Next Steps**:
1. [Action item]
2. [Action item]
3. [Action item]

---

Published by Shadows Company — "We work in the shadows to serve the Light."